Oscar Weightman vs James Beaven Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent performance, Weightman has a slight edge in winning points on their second serve at 45.14%, compared to Beaven's 41.88%. Does this indicate a stronger overall performance in matches? It could be a factor in determining match outcomes.
• When it comes to returning an opponent's second serve, Weightman again has a slight advantage, winning 42.86% of points, compared to Beaven's 41.3%. However, Beaven performs better on first serve returns, with 28.13% compared to Weightman's 22.22%.
• Under pressure, Beaven shines slightly more by saving 51.69% of breakpoints, whereas Weightman's breakpoint save rate stands at 48.78%. This could provide Beaven with a crucial edge in tight situations.
• Over the past year, Beaven has won 62.5% of their matches, significantly more than Weightman's 50% win rate, suggesting a consistent level of play on Beaven's part.
• Both players have their best career performance on hard courts. Weightman has a 53% win rate, outperforming Beaven's 48%. Perhaps this hints at Weightman's superior comfort on this surface.
• Beaven predominantly competes in lower-tier tournaments (Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K), winning 62.5%, while Weightman takes on higher-level competition (Challengers/ITF > $10K), winning 58.33%. Is Weightman better prepared for tougher challenges? This might be the case.
• Comparing opponent quality, Beaven faces stronger ranked opponents with an average rank of 190.97, whereas Weightman's opponents average a rank of 521.36. This suggests a potentially stronger competition faced by Beaven.
• Weightman excels in deciding sets, winning 67% in contrast to Beaven's 33%, indicating a potential advantage in closely contested matches.
• Weightman has superior breakpoint conversion lately, turning 43.48% of opportunities into breaks, compared to Beaven's 27.87%, possibly providing a tactical advantage.

Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance metrics reveals some compelling insights into the strengths and weaknesses of both players. Weightman tends to perform slightly better on second serve points and convert breakpoints more effectively than Beaven. This could give Weightman a crucial edge in pivotal match moments.

While Beaven demonstrates a consistent match-winning capability with a higher annual win rate, Weightman has shown resilience in crucial deciding set scenarios, suggesting mental toughness when under pressure.

The comparative difficulty of opponents shows Beaven typically faces tougher competition. However, Weightman’s experience in higher-level tournaments might balance out this factor, providing him with a subtler familiarity with higher pressure situations.

Based on these statistics, while Beaven holds certain consistency advantages, Weightman's ability to capitalize on breaks and handle high-pressure sets makes him the likely winner in the upcoming match.